GSLIS / The University of Texas at Austin
LIS 397 .1: Introduction to Research in Library and Information Science (Spring 2001), Dr. Ruth Palmquist

Review Sheet for Midterm


Folks, here they are...all the answers you were promised

A. Suppose you are a public library director interested in learning the effects of different promotional efforts on summer reading programs within the Texasville Public Library System. You suspect that a visit to each of the public elementary sc hools to describe the summer reading program may be a big help in boosting summer reading program participation. To obtain the funds needed to support these visits, in such a large metropolitan area as Texasville, and provide some simple bookmarks to stu dents with the summer reading schedule, you need to request money from the city council. They would like to be more convinced that your idea has merit, or at least that your effort could be measured and its effects known for the following year. So you decide to conduct a small study.

  1. Try to make a research question/statement about your idea.
  2. What do you think it would take to convince others that your statement is supportable?
  3. Write a simple research hypothesis for your study.
  4. Identify the variables you might examine and how you might operationalize them. Which are dependent or independent and given the choices you made about variables what are the levels of measurement of those variables?
  5. What realistic barriers might prevent you from making the above statement? List all practical barriers you can think of and try to classify these barriers as noise or bias. How might these threaten the validity and reliability of your study?
B. Here are two sets of scores. Look at them and try to summarize the two sets fairly. Use whichever of the descriptive techniques (stem and leaf, boxplots, frequency polygon, etc.) you think might best "explain" the two sets of scores to someone else. (Remember the gravel pile. Also, keep the two sets of numbers separate.)
 
 
  1. 4 0 6 7 6 2 3 3 4 5 1 3 0 1 4 4 5 4 6 2

  2.  

     

  3. 1 5 9 4 3 7 6 7 8 5 6 3 1 9 6 8 5 1 3 6
Suppose these scores came from a properly executed study concerning the influence of classroom temperature on achievement. The scores in 1) came from a classroom with 70 degrees Fahrenheit and the scores in 2) came from a classroom with a temperature of 90 degrees.

 Looking at the data in either a frequency polygon or a stem and leaf display, what suspicions might you have about the data for Group b. What figures might you use to enhance someone else's understanding of the graphic display of the data?

Stem and Leaf
 
 
90F Classroom Units 70F Classroom
xx 9 -
xx 8 -
xx 7 x
xxxx 6 xxx
xxx 5 xx
x 4 xxxxx
xxx 3 xxx
- 2 xx
xxx 1 xx
- 0 xx
C. Using one of the two groups in B. compute each of the following statistics:

Answers for 90F Classroom

Answers for 70F Classroom D. On which statistic mentioned in C. would the distribution "balance"? Of the measures of central tendency (mean, median, mode), which one(s) must be actual values in the data set?

 E. Plot the following bivariate data and describe your assessment of the "shape of the cigar." Can you make a rough estimate of the Pearson r value? Is there an outlier?
 
 

F. What are Katzer's "primary ways of knowings?" Can you give an example for each one?

G. How might you describe the process of doing a scientific study to another graduate student in the GSLIS, who is not taking research methods at this time?

H. Can you describe the difference between a simple random sample and a convenience sample? How about describing the usefulness of a snowball sampling technique?

I. Name three "beliefs" which are probably held by a researcher from the qualitative camp. How would these three "beliefs" differ in a researcher from the quantitative camp?

J. Name three characteristics of an ethical research study?

K. What elements would indicate a "true" experiment as opposed to a "quasi-"experiment? Which type of experiment allows you to make a stronger causal argument?

L. What is an "ex post facto" study and why is it the poorest approach for making a causal argument?

M. Choose a particular research methodology and explain its usefulness in assessing users' attitudes toward some system, system feature or a service. Imagine you are describing the methodology and its value to someone who is in the school but hasn't taken any research method courses. Now, try to choose a different methodol ogy and repeat the same task. How did the choice of method affect the sort of analysis you could conduct?

N. List the level of measurement, Nominal, Ordinal, Interval, or Ratio next to each of the following variables:
 
 

  1. numbers on a football jersey -- nominal

  2.  

     

  3. favorite flavors of ice cream -- ordinal

  4.  

     

  5. height for 7th graders -- ratio

  6.  

     

  7. religious belief -- nominal

  8.  

     

  9. temperature -- interval

  10.  

     

  11. hat size -- ratio

  12.  

     

  13. no. of books circulated -- ratio

  14.  

     

  15. LC call number designation -- nominal

  16.  

     

  17. ILL delivery time (in days) -- ratio
O. Define noise and bias. Which should a researcher prefer and why (or under what conditions)? Can a researcher unwittingly create bias in his/her own study? How? Can the subject create bias? Give some examples.



TA:  Don Drumtra
Updated: 25 February 2001